Posts filed under Careers (39)

Every summer, the Department of Statistics offers scholarships to high-achieving students so they can work with staff on real-world projects. Yongshi Deng, below, is working with communications company Vodafone New Zealand on a project analysing and predicting customer behaviour. 

Yongshi, who has a BSc in Mathematics and Statistics and an Honours in Statistics from the University of Auckland, is spending seven weeks working within Vodafone’s Big Data and Analytics team.

Her research focuses on analysing and modelling opt-out behaviour among Vodafone’s fixed line customers – those who have purchased broadband, landline telephone and television services. She is using a combination of data on what customers do when they use these services, network data and information from Vodafone’s call centre.

It’s a big job, Yongshi says, but she is relishing it: “I enjoy this project a lot, as I can put my knowledge I learn from my degrees into practice.” There are plenty of problems to solve: “The major challenge is data cleaning, since big, real-world datasets can be very messy. There are millions of missing values that need to be handled.”

Another challenge is variable selection. “The dataset I am currently working on has more than 120 variables, so this makes dimension reduction indispensable,” Yongshi explains. It’s critical that she chooses a good combination of variables to build models that can generalise well for unseen data. This step, she says, is based not only on statistical tests but also on domain knowledge, which she gets from her colleagues at Vodafone.

Yongshi’s supervisor at Vodafone, Neel Sengupta, says that having students in-house brings benefits to both parties. “They get to see what business data looks like and the sheer scale of it. The benefit for us is that we get to see the advancements coming out of universities that we might not necessarily see in a commercial set-up.”

Yongshi’s supervisor in the Department of Statistics, Ciprian Giurcaneanu, agrees that the biggest benefit to students of such work experience is that ”they get in contact with the real world. This allows them to see how useful in practice are the techniques that they have learned in our department.” They also have to fend for themselves: “The lecturer “who knows everything” is not there, and the students have to find their own answers to their questions.”

Yongshi is originally from Dongguan, China. This year, she plans to pursue a PhD at the University of Auckland, and already has a good idea of the field she wants to research: “I am particularly interested in applying machine learning techniques to solve real-world problems.”

Yongshi says that statistics is a “fantastic subject” that not only helps her explore the world, but keeps her motivated and engaged. She particularly appreciates the R programming skills that she has learned in the Department of Statistics. “The department provides a wide range of statistical courses and R is integrated in most courses, which has equipped me with the skill and knowledge I’ll need for further study.”

• For general information on University of Auckland summer scholarships, click here.

Every summer, the Department of Statistics offers scholarships to high-achieving students so they can work with staff on real-world projects. Simon Goodwin, below, is working with Dr Jesse Goodman on random graph dynamics and hitting times.

Simon’s summer scholarship is related to the study of random graphs, looking at how to investigate networks that look as if they are random or pseudo-random, like social networks, family trees or the global flight network.  His task in particular is looking at the nodes in these structures that are hard to reach by moving randomly, and what this means for the structure of the graph as a whole.

You can conceptualise it like this: Produce a random graph by connecting pairs of vertices uniformly at random. Then run a random walk on this random graph: at each step, move to a uniformly chosen neighbour of the current position. The hitting time is the number of steps needed to reach a particular target vertex, and it varies in a particular way depending on the size of the random graph.

Simon’s work looks at the effect of changing the random graph. Between each random walk step, he might “rewire” some edges: pick a fraction of edges, disconnect the vertices on either side, then randomly reconnect those vertices to see if these graph dynamics make it faster (or slower) to reach the target vertex.

“Looking at the structure of these random theoretical objects we can learn about vast real-world networks that have no clearly apparent structure,” Simon explains. “The results I am trying to find would also have theoretical applications in the study of random graphs.”

Simon is about to start his third year studying maths and statistics: “My main interest is in pure maths, but I am also very interested in theoretical statistics, mainly in probability. I am intrigued by all things random.”

In fact, he dropped physics for statistics last year, “and I haven’t regretted it for one moment – sorry physics! I am mainly interested in probability but I have also enjoyed learning about data analysis and I have an interest in statistical computing.”

He adds, “Probability is such an interesting field, as it has a strong theoretical backing while also having many obvious applications such as games with dice and cards, as well as many less obvious applications, from financial-market analysis to quantum physics.”

Simon is hoping to become an academic: “I hope to continue into postgraduate study and then spend the rest of my life studying and teaching what I love.” When he’s not studying, Simon loves playing video games and roleplaying games like Dungeons and Dragons, as well as walking around the scenic spots of Auckland.

• For general information  on University of Auckland summer scholarships, click here.

Every summer, the Department of Statistics offers scholarships to high-achieving students so they can work with staff on real-world projects. Yiwen, below, is working with Professor Chris Wild on iNZight, the free data visualisation and analysis software he developed.

Yiwen is doing a conjoint BSc and BCom majoring in Statistics, Mathematics and Finance at the University of Auckland. She’s from China, and moved here seven years ago.

Yiwen is working on the Department of Statistics-based data analysis package iNZight.

This is a free, R-based environment started by statistics education expert Professor Chris Wild to help high-school students quickly and easily explore data and understand some statistical ideas.

However, iNZight has grown, and now extends to multivariable graphics, time series, and generalised linear modelling, including modelling of data from complex surveys. It is available in web and desktop versions.

As iNZight has expanded, it has needed tweaking and tidying, and Yiwen is working on how it copes with incoming data that has date and time fields telling us when something happened. “These data are most likely to be in non-standard form, meaning our computing software cannot recognise and get useful information from it,” she explains.

Yiwen has been working with the iNZight team to develop functions to convert raw dates and times data to a standard format that iNZight can recognise, and extract desired components from a dates-and-times variable. “If we are able to automate how dates and times are handled by our computing software, we can plot dates and times together with our observations.”

Yiwen is finding the work stimulating and fun, “since we get to do things that are more practical, and it is exciting to see how the functions you build actually work on various data sets. And since we are given plenty of time in the project, it really encourages you to explore what is out there and extend your knowledge to more advanced coding stuff.”

High-achieving students like are a critical part of the development of iNZight, says Chris Wild. “It’s a student-driven project, so most of the big-scale changes occur over the New Zealand summer period. At other times, we mostly work on small changes and bug fixes.”

+ For general information  on University of Auckland summer scholarships, click here.

Every summer, the Department of Statistics offers scholarships to high-achieving students so they can work with staff on real-world projects. Grace Namuhan, below, is working with Professional Teaching Fellow Anna Fergusson on the design of interactive data visualisation tools for large classes.

Stage one Statistics courses are enormously popular at the University of Auckland – there are more than 2,000 students per semester, and single lectures may contain up to 600 students. Anna Fergusson, who is part of the stage one teaching team, is a keen developer of in-class web apps to engage these students. For example, you might get students to respond to questions via their own devices, with the data collected to a Google sheet that can then be analysed in class. Working alongside Anna, Grace has been exploring the principles of designing such data visualisation interactives for large-scale learning.

In particular, she is working on an interactive to collect finer-grained data on how students carry out a hypothesis test – in particular, a Chi-square test for independence. This particular app is not for live analysis – rather, she is tracking every point, click, and selection students make as they work through the interactive.

She’s had to work out what data to collect and how to store it, and also develop a plan to analyse this very rich and complex data set – even this one app involves thousands and thousands of rows of data. She also has to consider what an educator would want to know from the data.

Grace, a third-year Bachelor of Science student undergraduate majoring in Data Science, says the project is exercising what she has learned so far, “which are my programming skills for creating the interactive and statistical skills for analysing the information extracted from the interactive”.

However, Grace didn’t start out her undergraduate studies in statistics – she did a year of biomedical science “but I didn’t really enjoy it. Data science just came out as a new major when I wanted to change my major – it involves half statistics courses and half computer science courses, so I thought it would be a really suitable major for me.”

Statistics appeals to Grace as she is “quite a practical person; turning what might look meaningless data into something useful is really fascinating. There are a lot of invisible data around us in our daily lives; being a data interpreter makes me feel like I am useful”.

• For general information on University of Auckland summer scholarships, click here.

• To find out more about Anna’s work in developing resources for large-class teaching, click here.

Every summer, the Department of Statistics offers scholarships to high-achieving students so they can work with staff on real-world projects. Monica Merchant, right, is working with Professor Chris Wild on iNZight, the free data visualisation and analysis software he developed.

Monica, a BCom (Hons)/BSc student, is working on developing the predictive analytics module of the iNZight software, a toolbox that allows that allows users to build their own predictive model from a real-world dataset of their choice.

The module – whose interface is menu-driven and doesn’t require any knowledge of R, the environment in which iNZight is developed – guides the user through the model-building process, from data pre-processing and model training to tuning and validation.

Most importantly, says Monica, the module goes beyond traditional modelling methods by giving the user access to the full suite of machine learning algorithms available in R. Users can apply multiple algorithms to the data to explore differences in fit, predictive performance and generalisability.

This project is useful, says Monica, because it gives us another way to make sense of the data around us: “There is a lot of it and not all of it is created equal. We need ways to intelligently convert these large volumes of data into meaningful insights and actionable knowledge.”

She adds, “This is where machine learning comes in – the basic idea is to let the machine iteratively learn from the data to uncover underlying relationships and patterns or predict outcomes.”

Monica points out that while machine learning as a concept isn’t new – much of the theoretical groundwork behind many of its algorithms was laid in the mid-to-late 20th century – it has been only in recent years that advances in computational power have enabled us to make large-scale use of these algorithms in the real world.

Today, these algorithms are used everywhere, from bioinformatics and medical diagnosing to software engineering, financial markets, agriculture, astronomy and self-driving cars – but as Monica says, “this barely scratches the surface – check out Google Brain and DeepMind”.

Monica started her university career studying a Bachelor of Commerce in Finance, Accounting and Economics. Her Honours dissertation looked at the predictive power of option-implied risk-neutral densities, which sparked an interest in statistical computing. She added a BSc in Statistics.

Asked why statistics appeals, she says, “a degree in statistics is powerful since it offers a diverse and nearly limitless range of applications. I don’t have to limit myself to any one industry. Monica describes herself as inquisitive by nature, “so using data to solve real-world problems is always very rewarding”.

• For general information on University of Auckland summer scholarships, click here.

Every summer, the Department of Statistics offers scholarships to high-achieving students so they can work with staff on real-world projects. Xin Qian, in the picture, is working with Dr Ben Stevenson, an expert in statistical methods for estimating animal populations.

How can you work out how many creatures inhabit a space when they are elusive, small and have lots of places to hide? Sitting in the bush for months and trying to count what you hear won’t be accurate – and it’s probably not a good use of time.

Another way is to estimate animal abundance is through acoustic surveys, which use microphone arrays to record animal chirps and calls; statistical techniques are then used to estimate the population. This is called spatial capture-recapture (SCR), and at present we have several ways of analysing the data.

That’s where summer student Xin Qian comes in. He is working with SCR expert Dr Ben Stevenson on a simulation project that compares two ways of analysing acoustic data. They are using statistics gathered from surveys of the rare moss frog, which exists only on South Africa’s Cape Peninsula.  

“We want to find out which is the best method for providing an accurate and stable estimation of frog density, factoring in the time each method takes,” says Xin. The existing method, he explains, requires that you go and collect independent data about how often individual frogs chirp in order to estimate animal density, which takes time.

However, the new method, developed by Ben Stevenson’s former MSc student Callum Young, promises to estimate both call rates and therefore animal density from the main survey alone. Says Ben: “This can save time, but may possibly leave you with a less accurate answer. What we are hoping to do is resolve the trade-off. How is the precision of our estimates affected if we switch to the new method? My guess is that it will be worse. Is this sacrifice worth the saving in fieldwork time?”

For this work they are using R, a programming language for statistical computing and graphics developed in the Department of Statistics in the mid-1990s and now used all over the world.

The project is ideal for Xin, a third-year University of Auckland BSc student majoring in Statistics and Information Systems. “It is always interesting to get information from data; it makes me feel like I am having some secret conversation with data that people can’t hear,” he says. “I normally won’t get bored dealing with numbers, and I prefer things having a logic or a reason behind them.”

Xin was born and raised in China, in the small east-coast city of Jiaxing near Shanghai. After finishing secondary school in China, he moved to New Zealand to pursue tertiary studies, starting his degree in 2016.

The University of Auckland appealed to him “because of its good reputation and ranking.” Although education rather than environment drew him to this country, he says that “New Zealand is a beautiful place with splendid natural views, and most people here are nice and welcoming; I have made lots of friends here. I have also became more outgoing and willing to try various outdoor activities that I wouldn’t get a chance to try if staying in my hometown.”  

• For general information on University of Auckland summer scholarships, click here.

Jenny Bryan @JennyBryan was one of several leading women in data science who attended this week’s joint conference of the New Zealand Statistical Association, the International Association of Statistical Computing (Asian Regional Section) and the Operations Research Society of New Zealand at the University of Auckland, so we couldn’t miss the opportunity to talk with her (Jenny’s conference presentation, titled “Zen and the aRt of workflow maintenance”, is here). A brief bio: Jenny is a software engineer at RStudio while on leave from her role as Associate Professor in Statistics at the University of British Columbia, where she was a biostatistician. Jenny serves in leadership positions with rOpenSci and Forwards and is a member of The R Foundation. She takes special delight in eliminating the small agonies of data analysis.

Statschat: When did you first encounter statistics as a young person? Jenny: I was an economics major which had exactly one required statistics paper, which I took, and then continued to try and make that degree as un-quantitative as I possibly could. I had started out thinking I would major in some form of engineering, and therefore was taking math and physics and the technical track.

I was one of very few women in the course, and the culture of the course was to pull an all-nighter once a week [to do the weekly problem set]. The average mark on the exam would be 20 out of 100, and I was mentally not prepared for this type of sort of stamina-driven culture.

Was it a macho culture? That’s how it felt to me, and you needed enough innate confidence to never worry about the fact that you were getting marks you had never seen before in your life – everyone failed miserably all the time. After the first semester or two of this, I decided it wasn’t for me and declared my major to be German literature, which I saw through. But in the last two years at university, I realised I needed to be employable when I graduated, so I added economics as a means to making sure I could make a living later.

I worked as a management consultant for a couple of years and that’s where I learned that I was actually at my happiest when they locked in a room by myself with a huge spreadsheet and I had some data task ahead of me … and so then I gradually worked my way back to what I think I’m really good at.  

Did you pursue statistics qualifications? I did. After my two years of management consulting, the normal track would be to be sent off to business school. But thanks to what I learned about myself, I was pretty sure that wasn’t the right track for me. But I had learned how to give talks, how to extract questions from people and go and make it quantitative and then translate my solution back into their language. So the management consulting experience was super-useful.

At that point, I had met my husband, and I followed him to his first postdoc with no particular plans. He’s a mathematician – he knew he wanted to be a mathematician when he was 6. I never had that kind of certainty about what I was meant to do! It took me a lot longer to figure it out.

So I followed him, and basically played a lot of tennis at first (laughs) while were living in Southern California … I decided some form of statistics would be ideal for me, but I didn’t have enough of a math background to take the specialised math exams in the US, called the GREs [Graduate Record Examinations] that a lot of statistics departments want to see. So I started taking as many prerequisites as I could at the university where he was doing his postdoc. I did well and started working as a teaching assistant in these classes as well.

Then we moved together, two years later, for him to start his second postdoc and for me to start biostatistics grad school. Also during this time, I supported myself doing fancy Excel work as a temp … so I did a PhD in Biostatistics at Berkeley in five years – the first two years are the masters, and three years of writing the thesis.

What’s your academic career path been since then? I got my job at University of British Columbia before I graduated, and I was there until I went on leave earlier this year. I’ve since been working in Hadley Wickham’s group at RStudio. My title is software engineer, which I still find a bit peculiar.

Why? Because I feel I should have more formal training in engineering to have that title, but I’m getting more comfortable with it.

What’s the essence of your role there? I spend about two-thirds of my effort on package development and package maintenance. Hadley is starting to gradually give maintainership of his packages to other people … so I took over readxl. I already had an existing line of work in making R talk to Google APIs [application programming interface], so I worked with an intern this summer and we created a package from scratch so that you can use Google Drive from R. Now I’m revisiting some general tools for authenticating with Google APIs, and I have another package that talks to Google spreadsheets. I also do quite a bit of talking and teaching.

You put a lot of your work on the internet. Why do you feel that is important to share it this way? I decided this was how I was going to interpret what it meant to be a scholar. Several years ago, I decided that teaching people about the process of data analysis was super-important to me, and was being completely undertaught, and I was going to dedicate a lot of my time to it. Luckily, I already had tenure at that point, but it still looks a bit like career suicide to make this decision, because it means that you’re not producing conventional statistical outputs like methodological papers. I also felt like putting my stuff out there and having a public course webpage and pushing things out would be my defence against [any suggestion] that I wasn’t doing anything.

You’re clearly not satisfied that the current academic system is serving the subject well. Not at all! We have a really outdated notion that only publications matter, and publications where there’s novel methodology. I think that’s leaving a ton of value on the table – making sure that statistical methods that exist are actually used, or used correctly. But the field is not set up to reward that – the majority of papers are not widely read and cited, and many of these methods are not used or implemented in any practical way …. it’s been enshrined that academic papers are what counts, but they’re not a directly consumable good by society. We need knowledge-translation activity as well.

So you’re rebelling. Well, I felt that the only way you could do it was to start doing the things you thought were valuable. Being able to put your course material online, to have a dialogue with people in your field on Twitter … you can finally remove a lot of these gatekeepers from your life. They can keep doing their thing, but I know people care and read this stuff. Since I was able to wait until I had security of employment, I decided that if that meant I didn’t go from associate to full [professor], I could live with that. It’s not that my department isn’t [supportive] – it’s either neutral or positive on all this. But it’s true that everyone else I was hired with is a full professor and I’m not.

Does that bug you? Yes and no. I think I could have pushed harder. But every time you push on these things, you’re basically asked, “Well, can you make what you do look more like a statistics publication? Each package that you write, can you write a stats paper around it?” and I’ve decided the answer is, “No. Can we agree that is not a helpful way to evaluate this work? The only reason to repackage it in that way is to check some box.”

Academics are becoming increasingly dissatisfied with academic publishing structures. Do you think that perhaps data scientists might take the lead in dismantling structures that aren’t helping the subject? Maybe, and I think things are changing. But I decided that it’s like turning the Titanic and it’s not going to happen on a time-scale consistent with my career.  I can’t wait for academia to gradually reshape itself.

Is that one of the reasons you went off to RStudio? Oh, absolutely. I feel the things I do are tolerated in academia, and often found very useful, [but that said], I lost my grant funding the more applied I became. It’s harder to get promoted. You’re pressured to sell your work as something it’s not, just because that’s what the status quo rewards. Working at RStudio, I’m actually allowed to say what I do is what I do, and be proud of it, and be told that you are excellent at it, which is not currently possible in academic statistics.

So tell me about your typical day, working for RStudio. It’s a remote company. There is an office in Boston and a large enough group in Seattle that they rent a space, but the rest of us are on our own. So it’s just me alone at home working on my projects. We use Slack as a communication channel; the team I’m on maintains two channels for two separate groups of packages. We might have a group conversation going and it can be completely silent for three days, or we can have 100 messages in a morning. It really depends when someone raises an issue that other people care about, or can help out with. And then, I have private one-off conversations with Hadley or other members of the group, and similarly, they can be very quiet or suddenly light up.

Who do you live with? My husband’s a professor, so he’s mostly on campus but sometimes he’s around – we both like working at home and being alone together. The kids are all at home; they go to school from 9am until 3pm or 4pm. My oldest is 14 and I have twins who are about to turn 12.

So how do you manage work-life balance, given that you work from home? Well, I work when they are not there, then I try to work from 3pm to 6pm, or 4pm to 6pm, with mixed success, I would say. Then there are a couple of hours which are explicitly about driving people here and there. I do a second shift from 9pm to 1am or 2am.

Are you a night owl? Yeah, which I don’t love, but that’s just how things are in my life right now. I have to do it that way. I have one productive shift while the children are at school, then one productive shift after they go to bed.

Let’s talk about women in data science. I have the impression that maths remains male-dominated and that statistics is less so, but that data science appeals to women and that the numbers are quite good. What’s your take on that?  The reason I liked statistics, and particularly liked applied statistics, is I was never drawn to math for maths’ sake, or the inherent beauty of math. I enjoyed doing it in the service of some other thing that I care about … I think it’s possible that there’s something about me that’s typical of other women, where having that external motivation is what makes you interested in, or willing to do, the math and the programming. For its own sake, it never really appealed to me that much. Programming appeals to me more on its own than math does. Programming actually can motivate me just because I love the orderliness of it and accomplishing these little concrete tasks – I love checking lists (laughs) and being able to check my work and know that it is correct … When you combine it with, “This is going to enable us to answer some question”, then it’s really irresistible.

So it’s the real-world nature of it that is really appealing to you. Yeah – I care about that a lot.

What skills and attributes make a good data scientist? I think being naturally curious, doing something for the sake of answering the question versus a “will-this-be-in-the-test?” mentality – just trying to do the minimum.

You need a huge tolerance for ambiguity. This is a quality I notice that we’re spending a lot of time on in our Master of Data Science programme at UBC. Half the students have worked before and about half are straight out of undergrad, and the questions they ask us are so different. The people straight out of undergrad school expect everything to be precisely formulated, and the people who’ve worked get it, that you’re never going to understand every last thing; you’re never going to be given totally explicit instructions. Figuring out what you should be doing is part of your job. So the sooner you develop this tolerance for ambiguity [the better] – that makes you very successful, instead of waiting around to be given an incredibly precise set of instructions. Part of your job is to make that set of instructions.

How much room for creativity is there in data science?  I think there’s a ton. There’s almost never one right answer – there’s a large set of reasonable answers that reasonable people would agree are useful ways of looking at it. I think there’s huge scope to be creative. I also think being organised and pleased by order frequently makes this job more satisfying. People come to you with messy questions and messy data, and part of what you’re doing is this sort of data therapy, helping them organise their thoughts: “What is your actual question? Can the data you have actually answer that question? What’s the closest we can get?” Do that, then package it nicely, you do feel like you’ve reduced entropy! It feels really good.

You work from home and that suits you, but not every woman is able to do that.  What needs to change to help women scientists’ progress through life and career, balancing what they need to balance? I don’t how specific this is to data science, but three things were helpful to me. One is I live in Canada, where we have serious maternity leave – you can take up to a year, and because that’s what the Government makes possible, that means it’s normal. In both cases, I took between six and nine months – I was begging to come back before a year! But having a humane amount of time for maternity leave is important.

Also, what’s typical in Canada, and what and UBC does, is that they pause any sort of career clock for a reasonable amount of time. So every time I went on maternity leave it added one year to my tenure clock.

You don’t end up out of synch with people who hadn’t been away. Yeah. It [parenthood] still slows your career down, but this helps immensely. So there are the structural policies.

Secondly, I do have a really supportive spouse. I feel like maybe I was lead parent when the kids were little, but since I made this career pivot and became much more interested in my work, he’s really taken the lead. I feel that there were many years where I was the primary parent organising the household, and now it’s really the other way around … that’s huge.

Third, I’m in my mid-late 40s now and I’m embarking on what feels to me like a second career; certainly, a second distinct part of my career and focusing more on software development. I think you also have to be willing to accept that women’s careers might unfold on a different time-scale. You might lose a few years in your 30s to having little kids … but you often find awards that are for people within five years of their PhD or for young investigators and they assume that you don’t have all this other stuff going on. I think another thing is [employers] being willing to realise that someone can still be effective, or haven’t reached their peak, in their 40s. The time-frame on which all of this happens needs to be adjusted. You need to be flexible about that.

Read more about Jenny Bryan:

Her academic page

A profile by rOpenSci.org

Australian Di Cook @visnut was one of several leading women in data science who attended this week’s joint conference of the New Zealand Statistical Association, the International Association of Statistical Computing (Asian Regional Section) and the Operations Research Society of New Zealand at the University of Auckland, so we couldn’t miss the opportunity to talk with her. A brief bio: Di is a world leader in data visu­al­isa­tion and well-known for her work on inter­ac­tive graph­ics. She is Professor of Business Analytics in the Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics at Monash University. She’s a Fellow of the American Statistical Association, elected member of the R Foundation and the Editor of the Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics. Her research lies in data science, data visualisation, exploratory data analysis, data mining, high-dimensional methods and statistical computing.

Statschat: When did you first encounter statistics? Di: It was in my undergraduate degree. I studied mathematics with a plan to do math teaching. Statistics was one of the areas of mathematics that I could major in other than pure, or applied, mathematics. There was an extremely good female professor at the University of New England, Eve Bofinger, and I was drawn to some of the methods she was teaching, and that led me into statistics.

What was your career path after that?  I taught math at high school for about three months, then I had an offer from the Australian National University to go there as a research assistant, and that seemed a better fit. As a research assistant, I got to learn a lot more things, particularly computing. Computing, I think, is a critical aspect of data science today.

I spent a few years doing that and then realised I’d really like to make art, because some of the research-assistant work I was doing was computer graphics for data online. It fed into my art instincts from teenage years, so I spent some time as an artist before finding a graduate programme in statistics in the US that focused on data visualisation.

What sort of art do you do? I was painting – I haven’t done any for a long, long time, since I finished my PhD; it’s been too busy.

So your creative pursuits have fed into your career. Yeah – seeing that I could do data visualisation as a part of the statistics allowed me to realise that I could do a higher degree in stats; that merged my interests very well.

Where did you do your PhD? At Rutgers University in New Jersey.

You spent 22 years at Iowa State University in the US, and moved to Monash in Australia in 2015. What are your major projects there? I have a lot of projects. One of them is with Tennis Australia; we’ve been looking at tennis serves. So we have Hawk-Eye trajectory data and we visualise the tennis serves and look at how the players are different or similar.

That’s very cool – how’s that for applied statistics. Yeah, it’s fantastic, isn’t it. We’re also looking at face recognition in tennis video, to be able to detect the face through broadcast video, so that we can monitor emotions throughout a match and see how that affects performance.

We’re also looking at pedestrian sensor data, that comes from a city of Melbourne (almost live) feed. One of my PhD students, Earo, has a new type of plot called a calendar plot; you make your data plots into a calendar format so that you can study things relative to holidays, and put it really on a human pattern basis.

Describe a typical day at work at Monash. We have a lot of meetings with students, so I would meet up with two or three students – PhD students or postdocs or research assistants – on projects that we’re working with, and meet up with other faculty. On some days I’m teaching data science classes to around 200 students. We often just go for a coffee with colleagues. We also play ping-pong on the conference table! I’ve got a good group of colleagues who play tennis, so we play tennis together.

It sounds very collegial. You’re a prominent woman in data science, and the field seems to appeal to women as a career path. Do have any thoughts on that? I haven’t really looked at those numbers … but honestly, I think there’s too big of an emphasis on gender differences, and they’re not real when you look at the metrics. It’s just a perception. But one of the things I notice with the women that I work with is that they are interested in solving problems, and having an outcome of their work that makes life better for others. And that’s one thing that data science offers that pure statistics research is a bit removed from.

Do you have a family? I have one son. I moved to Monash after he graduated high school. He went off to college in the US, while I moved halfway across the globe, which he was quite happy about. He visits during the holidays, and last American summer found an internship at Monash University.

When he was small, how did you navigate work and life? It’s really difficult. I can’t imagine how single women do that – you need to have some sort of support mechanism. Day-care is amazing – and however much you spend on day-care, it’s worth it. And also partly because I think young kids early on really get a huge amount of benefit from being in the social mix of other kids the same age. He was in day-care from three months, part-time, and even at five months, if we were away for a week, when he’d get back, the other babies were over the moon – they recognised each other. I hadn’t realised how early on that socialisation happens.

So you weren’t concerned about day-care at all. Some women get tied up in knots about putting their kids in day-care. I know – there’s this thing about guilt. It is actually the best environment – they [pre-school educators] can do a much better job than me. If my time pressure is relieved by not having to have every moment dealing with all the stuff you have to deal with young kids … he’s come out as being a very sociable child and that he learnt from early on. Guaranteed when you’ve got the most important meeting, and your husband has a most important meeting at exactly the same time, that’ll be the time your kid gets sick. So you have to have a backup.

So what advice do you give other academic mums? Don’t stress – there are ways around. And the meeting you think is most important doesn’t have to be the most important. You just juggle everything you have as well as you can, and there are ways around any hurdle or hiccup. Just keep out there. It’s really important for other younger women to see women in senior roles.

Are universities doing the necessary to help women make the most of their talents in data science? I think it’s still a struggle. I think there’s been bureaucratic pushes for gender equality, which is really how I actually got an academic position in the first place in the US.

How so? Equal opportunity. Many statistics departments had no women, and it was a cultural shift in the early 1990s that many university administrations were forcing departments to hire women … or otherwise they couldn’t hire … if they [universities] were doing it well, they were not putting women in that situation of thinking, “Oh I was only hired because I was a woman”. They were doing it in the sense of making sure that women realised that they were talented, and wanted for their  talents, not just because of the administration push. But that wasn’t universal.

I thought things have been solved, but it’s not. Time and time again women are evaluated differently at promotion, and in classroom evaluations, they are not on average [rated to be] as good as the men, and that’s been shown again and again and again. So the thing is, don’t get put off by that; you will sometimes need to fight for your promotions and have people willing to fight for you.

Systemically, things are still not weighted fairly between men and women. It’s not. I’ve just finished studying some of the research-grant rates in Australia and the number given to women faculty are pitiful, from both the Australian Research Council and the National Health and Medical Research Council, which is the health sciences. That impacts whether women can get through to those higher ranks. That’s my next fight.

Would you see yourself as a crusader? How do you define yourself in exposing these inequalities? We’ve seen a lot of things [around sex, privilege and power discussed] in public in these last few months, with the sex scandals in Hollywood.  I’ve seen that all through my career in academia. I think we, hopefully, are on a cusp where the playing field for recognising talent among women becomes more level … I had advantages early on, and I feel like I need to pay that back.

I wouldn’t say I’m a crusader; I’m saying I see where we’ve come from, in terms of generations of women in my family, and where we are now, and we’ve come a long, long way. I’ve had so many more opportunities than my mum and my grandmother … I feel like I’ve got a responsibility to those generations to keep it moving in the right direction.

What advice would you give young women looking at a career in data science? What skills and attributes do they need to develop? Get onto the publicly available software – free software like R and Python – and get to know them. These are hugely powerful, and they give you power. There’s a number of courses you can do for free to help learn how to work with data.

Any particular courses that you would recommend? There’s Data Camp and Corsera and Software Carpentry, among others. Work with data. Play. Extract somebody’s tweets and analyse the text – there are really good resources for that. Pull data from the government web pages – they have lots of information. The New Zealand Herald has lots of data available. Just get comfortable finding data, making plots of it, and seeing whether it matches up what the media is reporting about a problem. This is the sort of power you can get over your life if you can make decisions yourself, rather than being fed decisions.

Read more about Di Cook:

Her academic page

Wikipedia

Another Q & A

Every summer, the Department of Statistics offers scholarships to a number of students so they can work with staff on real-world projects. Katie, right, is working on the New Zealand Socio-Economic Index with Dr Barry Milne of COMPASS (Centre of Methods and Policy Application in the Social Sciences) and Professor Alan Lee from the Department of Statistics. Katie explains:

“The New Zealand Socio-Economic Index (NZSEI) assigns occupations a score that enables us to measure the socio-economic status of people in that occupation. It’s calculated using the average age, income and education level of people with each job. For example, doctors would have a very high socio-economic index, because they’re typically high-earning and well-educated people.

“The NZSEI has been created from Census data since the 90s, but has not yet been updated for the most recent Census in 2013. In this project, my job is to update the NZSEI using path analysis, and check that this updated version is appropriate for all people in New Zealand. A couple of examples include assessing that the index is valid for all ethnicities, and valid for workers in both urban and rural regions.

“The index is important to measure any changes to New Zealand over time, as it is updated with each Census. As well as this, the NZSEI uses a similar methodology to international scales, so international comparisons are possible.

“I am currently in my third year of studying Mathematics and Statistics at the University of Sheffield in England, and I’m halfway through my year here in Auckland as an exchange student. I’ve always been interested in Statistics and studying it at university level has shown me how applicable it is in a variety of fields, from finance to biology.

“Over the summer, I’m looking forward to exploring New Zealand more.”

Every year, the Department of Statistics offers summer scholarships to a number of students so they can work with staff on real-world projects. Yiying, right, is working on a project called Modelling Competition and Dispersal in a Statistical Phylogeographic Framework with Dr Stéphane Guindon.  Yiying explains.

 “The processes that govern the spatial distribution of species are complex. Traditional approaches in ecology generally rely on the hypothesis that adaptation to the environment is the main force driving this distribution.

“The supervisors of this project propose an alternative explanation that assumes that species are found in certain places simply because they were the first to colonise these locations during the course of evolution. They have recently designed a stochastic model that explains the observed spatial distribution of species using a combination of dispersal events (i.e., species migrating to new territories) and competition between species.

“In this project, I will run in silico [computer] experiments and analyse real data in order to validate the software Phyloland that implements our dispersal-competition model.

“To validate the model, we will randomly generate ‘true value’. Then we will use the model to make estimations of the true value. If the estimated values match the true value relatively closely, then the model is reliable.

“I am doing a BCom/BSc conjoint degree. My majors are Finance, Accounting and Statistics – 2015 is my fourth year. I am planning to do an Honours degree in statistics, so this summer research project is a very valuable experience for me.

“I enjoy statistics because it brings me closer to the real world. Sometimes, things are not simply what we see. Without data, we would never have convincing evidence about what is really happening. The amount of information out there is massive and statistics can help people tell how reliable a statement is. Studying statistics has helped me make better use of information and think more critically.

“My plans for summer include relaxing and reading more books. And having plenty of sleep.”