Denominators (when cellphones attack)
A question that is very unlikely to be interesting: were there more cellphone-related injuries in Dunedin or Auckland last year?
Auckland has a lot more people. Of course it has more cellphone-related injuries.
A question that is moderately unlikely to be interesting, but, ok, you might need to write a story: were people in Auckland more likely to have cellphone-related injuries than people in Dunedin?
So, where the Herald website (and presumably the ODT originally) has
In the three years to the end of 2016, ACC received 23 claims for cellphone injuries from Dunedin people and paid claimants a total of $10,436…
Statistics provided by ACC show Aucklanders made the highest number of claims at 190, costing a total of $76,159
the second paragraph might be better as
Although Auckland has more than ten times as many people, the home of the Vodafone Warriors had only 190 claims, costing a total of $76,159
(Someone who can actually write might do better than me here. )