February 21, 2016

Evils of axis

From One News, tweeted by various people:

CbtrS2MUEAALlrk

The y-axis label is wrong: this has nothing to do with change, it’s percent support.

The x-axis label is maximally unhelpful: we can guess that the most recent poll is in February, but what are the earlier data? You might think the vertical divisions are months, but the story says the previous poll was in October.

Also, given that the measurement error is large compared to the expected changes, using a line graph without points indicating the observations is misleading.

Overall, the graph doesn’t add to the numbers on the right, which is a bit of a waste.

avatar

Thomas Lumley (@tslumley) is Professor of Biostatistics at the University of Auckland. His research interests include semiparametric models, survey sampling, statistical computing, foundations of statistics, and whatever methodological problems his medical collaborators come up with. He also blogs at Biased and Inefficient See all posts by Thomas Lumley »

Comments

  • avatar
    Peter Green

    Since the election:

    ONCB Polls: Feb,Apr,May,Jul,Sep,Oct,Feb

    N: 49,49,48,47,47,47,47
    L: 31,31,31,32,32,31,32
    G: 10,9,10,13,12,12,8
    NZF: 6,7,7,7,7,9,10

    The line for Labour increases from 31 to 32, meaning the graph must only go back to the previous poll in October. But the line for the Green Party starts at 13, that’s July! NZF’s line starts on 8. The last time CB had them on 8 is just before the Sept 2014 election!

    9 years ago

  • avatar
    Sam Warburton

    Colmar Brunton’s graph isn’t perfect either. Varying widths between years.

    http://www.colmarbrunton.co.nz/images/160222_ONE_News_Colmar_Brunton_Poll_report_13-17_Feb_2016.pdf

    9 years ago

    • avatar
      Thomas Lumley

      True, but it’s a whole lot better than One News’s effort.

      9 years ago