We have seen before on StatsChat that, worldwide, there’s no relationship between the position of the moon and the risk of earthquakes. Suppose, for the sake of argument, that there was some relationship in New Zealand. Imagine that in Wellington, 100% of big earthquakes happened in the 24-hour period centered on the moon’s closest approach to the earth. The real figure is more like 0%, since Sunday’s earthquake missed the window by a few hours (perigee was 8:28am Monday) and the 1855 Wairarapa quake and the 1848 Marlborough quake missed by days, but we’re running a thought experiment here. Would this level of prediction be useful?
At one or two big quakes per century, even if they all happened on a predictable day of the lunar month, that’s a risk of between 0.075% and 0.15% per month. At one extreme, you couldn’t evacuate Wellington every month to get around the risk (and even if you did, it would probably cause more injuries each month than happened in Sunday’s quake). At the other extreme, you could make sure you had a few days supply of water and food, and a plan for communicating with friends and relatives, but that’s a good idea even in the real world where earthquakes are unpredictable. The only thing I could think of is that you wouldn’t schedule major single-day tourist events (World Cup games, royal visits) or the most delicate pieces of construction work for that day.
[If you want to look up lunar distances, there’s a convenient online calculator. Note that the times are in UTC, so the NZ standard time is 12 hours later than given]